| | :::::::I [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Feedback&oldid=16310353#User:SemperBlotto repeat] what Mglovesfun said in WT:FEED: "Something doesn't have to be vandalism to be removed, it just has to be bad. If the version rolled back to is better than the previous version I support it. Wikipedia seems to have a habit of prioritizing contributors over its articles, I'd be delighted if we didn't do the same here." [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 07:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC) | | :::::::I [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Feedback&oldid=16310353#User:SemperBlotto repeat] what Mglovesfun said in WT:FEED: "Something doesn't have to be vandalism to be removed, it just has to be bad. If the version rolled back to is better than the previous version I support it. Wikipedia seems to have a habit of prioritizing contributors over its articles, I'd be delighted if we didn't do the same here." [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 07:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | :@Purplebackpack89, rubbish, anything can be rolled back. I've rolled back my own good faith edits before, therefore should I lose my admin privileges?! You're making the classic mistake of assuming that we're Wikipedia, and we're not. I hate the idea that someone who makes a good faith bad edit is immune to having that edit removed; we might as well say we welcome bad edits. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 12:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC) |
