| Wiktionary:Requests for verification Dec 29th 2012, 03:24 jádí dághaaʼígíí: actually, I'll post that in the BP | ← Older revision | Revision as of 03:24, 29 December 2012 | | Line 1,284: | Line 1,284: | | | :::::I have a copy in a box somewhere in my storage unit. If memory serves, it's over a thousand very large pages of near-microscopic type- potentially quite useful in hand-to-hand combat if one can lift it... [[User:Chuck Entz|Chuck Entz]] ([[User talk:Chuck Entz|talk]]) 05:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | :::::I have a copy in a box somewhere in my storage unit. If memory serves, it's over a thousand very large pages of near-microscopic type- potentially quite useful in hand-to-hand combat if one can lift it... [[User:Chuck Entz|Chuck Entz]] ([[User talk:Chuck Entz|talk]]) 05:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | | ::::::Chuck is certainly thinking of the same book I am, though I may have gotten the title wrong. Used properly with a sling, it could bring down a gnu. —[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] 10:30, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | ::::::Chuck is certainly thinking of the same book I am, though I may have gotten the title wrong. Used properly with a sling, it could bring down a gnu. —[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] 10:30, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | | − | | | | − | :@everyone: What change to our CFI would make it possible for us to have Navajo entries? I hope we all agree that ''some'' criterion is necessary and we shouldn't accept just ''anything'' any visitor to our site creates a ==Navajo== entry for, even if it's *[[dájíí jágaʼídí]] or *[[[[someotherplausiblecombinationofletters whichisneverthelessnotaword]]]]. What coherent criterion could Navajo meet? | | | − | :Wikimedia Commons copies appropriately-licensed pictures from Flickr, and is able to keep them even if the Flickr user subsequently changes the picture's license, because Commons has a recording system which notes that the picture had a valid license at the time it was copied. Are there non-durable Navajo dictionaries online that this term is in? Could we, for example, allow non-durable dictionaries to be used as references if two admins signed on an entry's talk page that they had checked and found the entry in the dictionary? If the dictionary later went offline or removed the entry, we would have the record that it had nonetheless had the entry at the time it had been used as a reference. Would that help? [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 03:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | | | | | | | | | == [[eye dialect]] == | | == [[eye dialect]] == | |  |
