| | ::::::: CodeCat sort of has a point, but it's kind of an insane one. "every word on Wiktionary that is not English should be wrapped in a HTML tag with a <tt>lang=</tt> attribute to specify the language". Um, we have trouble defining stuff like [[in]] in English. Also, there comes a point where you're putting computers ahead of human users. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 23:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC) | | ::::::: CodeCat sort of has a point, but it's kind of an insane one. "every word on Wiktionary that is not English should be wrapped in a HTML tag with a <tt>lang=</tt> attribute to specify the language". Um, we have trouble defining stuff like [[in]] in English. Also, there comes a point where you're putting computers ahead of human users. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 23:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC) |
| | :::::::: This doesn't affect human ''users'' in the slightest, neither positively not negatively. But just because editors don't know or care doesn't mean that something shouldn't be done. There's quite a distinction between not actively pursuing a certain style of writing entries, and actively ''prohibiting'' them which this nomination seems to do. {{User:CodeCat/signature}} 23:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC) | | :::::::: This doesn't affect human ''users'' in the slightest, neither positively not negatively. But just because editors don't know or care doesn't mean that something shouldn't be done. There's quite a distinction between not actively pursuing a certain style of writing entries, and actively ''prohibiting'' them which this nomination seems to do. {{User:CodeCat/signature}} 23:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | ::::::::: There are human users who it should affect; screenreaders can switch voices based on the language tag. If French is marked as French, blind users are much more likely to get a correct pronunciation.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 03:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
