| | I notice that you changed [[Duuv]] to use [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Duuv&diff=19095912&oldid=19080121 "Low Saxon (Low German)"]. Wiktionary never combines two languages into one header, and headers must always match language codes. Also, the guideline for Dutch Low Saxon nouns is that we, like nds-nl.WP, don't capitalise them, so if "duuv" is an attested Dutch Low Saxon spelling, it should be at [[[[duuv]]]] (though the Dutch Low Saxon WP uses "doeve", "doef", "duve" and "doewe"). Please comment in the RFM if you disagree with the mergers of the subdialects (or think the merger should go further, e.g. combining both the German and Dutch macro-varieties), or comment on the talk pages of [[WT:ANDS]], [[WT:ANDS-DE]] and [[WT:ANDS-NL]] if you have questions or suggestions. Cheers, [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 00:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC) | | I notice that you changed [[Duuv]] to use [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Duuv&diff=19095912&oldid=19080121 "Low Saxon (Low German)"]. Wiktionary never combines two languages into one header, and headers must always match language codes. Also, the guideline for Dutch Low Saxon nouns is that we, like nds-nl.WP, don't capitalise them, so if "duuv" is an attested Dutch Low Saxon spelling, it should be at [[[[duuv]]]] (though the Dutch Low Saxon WP uses "doeve", "doef", "duve" and "doewe"). Please comment in the RFM if you disagree with the mergers of the subdialects (or think the merger should go further, e.g. combining both the German and Dutch macro-varieties), or comment on the talk pages of [[WT:ANDS]], [[WT:ANDS-DE]] and [[WT:ANDS-NL]] if you have questions or suggestions. Cheers, [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 00:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
