Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]: User talk:TAKASUGI Shinji

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]
Track the most recent changes to the wiki in this feed.
User talk:TAKASUGI Shinji
Aug 30th 2012, 03:47

아버진 and 아줌만:

← Older revision Revision as of 03:47, 30 August 2012
Line 223: Line 223:
 
::::If there were too many of these, perhaps a redirect to the entry without the particle? I don't expect a flood of such entries, anyway. The entry explains what it is and how it's formed, so I don't see any problem even if they are kept as are. One important argument is that the word is merged with the particle. You can't simply remove it to get to the lemma form. --[[User:Atitarev|Anatoli]] <sup>([[User talk:Atitarev|обсудить]]</sup>/<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Atitarev|вклад]])</sup> 03:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 
::::If there were too many of these, perhaps a redirect to the entry without the particle? I don't expect a flood of such entries, anyway. The entry explains what it is and how it's formed, so I don't see any problem even if they are kept as are. One important argument is that the word is merged with the particle. You can't simply remove it to get to the lemma form. --[[User:Atitarev|Anatoli]] <sup>([[User talk:Atitarev|обсудить]]</sup>/<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Atitarev|вклад]])</sup> 03:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 
::::: It may be useful to have combinations of function words and ㄴ: 난 (← 나는), 넌 (← 너는), 전 (← 저는), 건 (← 거는), 엔 (← 에는), 에선 (← 에서는), 보단 (← 보다는), -긴 (-기는), etc, but not this time, I think. — [[User:TAKASUGI Shinji|T<small>AKASUGI</small> Shinji]] ([[User talk:TAKASUGI Shinji|talk]]) 03:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 
::::: It may be useful to have combinations of function words and ㄴ: 난 (← 나는), 넌 (← 너는), 전 (← 저는), 건 (← 거는), 엔 (← 에는), 에선 (← 에서는), 보단 (← 보다는), -긴 (-기는), etc, but not this time, I think. — [[User:TAKASUGI Shinji|T<small>AKASUGI</small> Shinji]] ([[User talk:TAKASUGI Shinji|talk]]) 03:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
:We do have [[gonna]], [[gotta]], [[helluva]], [[must've]], [[we're]], etc. They are colloquial merged forms. You don't have to create those forms NOW but why delete what is there already? People with low or no knowledge of Korean will have trouble finding {{l|ko|아버진}} or {{l|ko|아줌만}} in any dictionary. We should help, not make their studies/work harder. --[[User:Atitarev|Anatoli]] <sup>([[User talk:Atitarev|обсудить]]</sup>/<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Atitarev|вклад]])</sup> 03:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions