| | |
| Line 34: | Line 34: |
| | :The font in there isn't displaying correctly on my monitor. --[[User:Lo Ximiendo|Lo Ximiendo]] ([[User talk:Lo Ximiendo|talk]]) 20:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC) | | :The font in there isn't displaying correctly on my monitor. --[[User:Lo Ximiendo|Lo Ximiendo]] ([[User talk:Lo Ximiendo|talk]]) 20:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
| | ::I am a bit confused by your source. Indeed, you have created [[アママン]] but the website http://rlang.lib.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/rlang/myk/ says the translation of the word "water" is [[ミズ]] (http://rlang.lib.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/rlang/myk/details.php?ID=MY14438). Am I wrong? [[User:Pamputt|Pamputt]] ([[User talk:Pamputt|talk]]) 14:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC) | | ::I am a bit confused by your source. Indeed, you have created [[アママン]] but the website http://rlang.lib.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/rlang/myk/ says the translation of the word "water" is [[ミズ]] (http://rlang.lib.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/rlang/myk/details.php?ID=MY14438). Am I wrong? [[User:Pamputt|Pamputt]] ([[User talk:Pamputt|talk]]) 14:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | :::Please, could you answer. I would like only to know if there is a mistake and if the correct work is [[ミズ]] (I do not speak Japanese). Thanks in advance. [[User:Pamputt|Pamputt]] ([[User talk:Pamputt|talk]]) 10:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:46, 30 June 2012
[edit] Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
- Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
- Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
- The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
- We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Wiktionary:Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.
Again, welcome! --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Altaic and Korean
I noticed you've been adding etymologies to some Korean entries, including etymologies in Altaic. Altaic is a hypothesis that hasn't yet been agreed upon by linguists. The consensus on Wiktionary is that we should not add any Altaic etymologies to entries. I'm also not sure what 'Proto-Korean' is, since Korean is a language isolate I don't know what its 'common ancestor' would be. So could you please remove those etymologies? —CodeCat 17:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
All language families are hypotheses and there can never be absolute certitude. However, Altaic has plenty of evidence which I think should be documented here. Who decided that Altaic is somehow inferior to any other linguistic theory? Why can't it be on here? Also, Korean is not a language isolate, there used to be a few Korean languages (i.e. Silla) which descended into modern Korean and the Jeju dialect. And of course, Korean is part of Altaic, so once again it's not an isolate.
Again, I ask you, why should this linguistic evidence be ignored, especially when I have sources and I am documenting them on the pages I'm editing? —And_we_drown
- I'm just speaking for community consensus, I have no personal opinions on this. The community has agreed to not allow Altaic etymologies, since the category Category:Altaic languages failed a request for deletion. There is also a short discussion in the Beer Parlour about this topic, with the same conclusion. If you disagree you can continue that discussion. —CodeCat 17:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Could you direct me to that discussion in the Beer Parlour? It would be much appreciated. —And_we_drown
- It's at Wiktionary:Beer parlour#Altaic languages. —CodeCat 17:20, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Miyako Language Sources?
Hi there. I'm curious on where you got some Miyako words from. Besides, I think it's courteous to let others know about what languages you excel in with a user page of your own. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 08:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
http://rlang.lib.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/rlang/myk/ --And we drown 13:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- The font in there isn't displaying correctly on my monitor. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 20:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- I am a bit confused by your source. Indeed, you have created アママン but the website http://rlang.lib.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/rlang/myk/ says the translation of the word "water" is ミズ (http://rlang.lib.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/rlang/myk/details.php?ID=MY14438). Am I wrong? Pamputt (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Please, could you answer. I would like only to know if there is a mistake and if the correct work is ミズ (I do not speak Japanese). Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 10:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
