| User talk:Anglom Apr 12th 2013, 23:43 | | | | Line 27: | Line 27: | | | When moving them can you look at the "What links here" page of the old name, to see if there are any pages that need to be changed? You don't need to fix the Index pages because they are automatically updated. If the pages that link to the old page are redirects themselves, you can also mark them for deletion (they are mostly pages with "old" names using an * rather than /, we moved those a few years ago but the redirects remain). {{User:CodeCat/signature}} 12:40, 11 April 2013 (UTC) | | When moving them can you look at the "What links here" page of the old name, to see if there are any pages that need to be changed? You don't need to fix the Index pages because they are automatically updated. If the pages that link to the old page are redirects themselves, you can also mark them for deletion (they are mostly pages with "old" names using an * rather than /, we moved those a few years ago but the redirects remain). {{User:CodeCat/signature}} 12:40, 11 April 2013 (UTC) | | | :Hadn't even thought to do that; thank you. Will do. [[User:Anglom|Anglom]] ([[User talk:Anglom|talk]]) 17:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC) | | :Hadn't even thought to do that; thank you. Will do. [[User:Anglom|Anglom]] ([[User talk:Anglom|talk]]) 17:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC) | | | + | | | | + | == Proto-Germanic words and ogonki == | | | + | | | | + | Hello, good sir. | | | + | | | | + | I see that you are removing ogonki from (certain) Proto-Germanic pages but adding them to Proto-Germanic terms referenced in Etymology sections in the mainspace. I suspect you are planning to rename the Proto-Germanic pages so that the ogonek spellings are used. Is this right or no? If I'm not right, what is going on? Was this change discussed anywhere? | | | + | | | | + | ― [[User:Espreon|Espreon]] ([[User talk:Espreon|talk]]) 23:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:43, 12 April 2013 [edit] Reconstructions Reconstructed pages are always required to have descendants, so that they can be verified. —CodeCat 17:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC) - Okay, my mistake. I'll add what I can find. Thank you for the notification.Anglom (talk) 17:16, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
-
- The only related word I can find for it in Old English is 'temian', but that would not come from *tamjanan, right? Anglom (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- I've already added some. I don't know about "temian", it seems irregular, and looks like it should come from *temōnan or something like that. But I don't know any other languages that have such a form so it would be a rather dubious reconstruction. —CodeCat 17:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- Wow you work fast! Thank you for those. I will do my homework before I try again. Anglom (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Should this be ιζω? Mglovesfun (talk) 19:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC) - It could be. I couldn't find an entry for a verb-forming suffix from Latin and Ancient Greek to base it on, so I went with what was listed. If you think it should be, then we'll go with that. Anglom (talk) 19:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- I meant -ιζω, apologies. See Italian -izzare, which links to Latin -izo not -izare. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- It's been moved to -ίζω now. Thank you for your input, I appreciate it. Anglom (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- The page -ιζειν should be created again, though, with whatever is appropriate for an Ancient Greek infinitive form-of entry. And -ίζω needs an inflection table. —CodeCat 20:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, alright. I will do my best. Anglom (talk) 20:05, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
[edit] Categories Could you please fix the categories at leassagol? Currently the entry is added to English categories rather than Old English. You also may want to consider using {{compound}}. —CodeCat 15:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC) - Should be fixed now, sorry about that. Anglom (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
[edit] Moving the Germanic entries When moving them can you look at the "What links here" page of the old name, to see if there are any pages that need to be changed? You don't need to fix the Index pages because they are automatically updated. If the pages that link to the old page are redirects themselves, you can also mark them for deletion (they are mostly pages with "old" names using an * rather than /, we moved those a few years ago but the redirects remain). —CodeCat 12:40, 11 April 2013 (UTC) - Hadn't even thought to do that; thank you. Will do. Anglom (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
[edit] Proto-Germanic words and ogonki Hello, good sir. I see that you are removing ogonki from (certain) Proto-Germanic pages but adding them to Proto-Germanic terms referenced in Etymology sections in the mainspace. I suspect you are planning to rename the Proto-Germanic pages so that the ogonek spellings are used. Is this right or no? If I'm not right, what is going on? Was this change discussed anywhere? ― Espreon (talk) 23:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)  |  |
