Talk:pedagogue Mar 31st 2013, 22:59 | | Line 1: | Line 1: | | ==Old French== | | ==Old French== | | I think we're missing a section on this because the English's etymology section links to a nonexistent one. Should it be set up? [[User:Etym|Etym]] ([[User talk:Etym|talk]]) 22:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | | I think we're missing a section on this because the English's etymology section links to a nonexistent one. Should it be set up? [[User:Etym|Etym]] ([[User talk:Etym|talk]]) 22:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | | + | : It's listed on [[User:Mglovesfun/to do/Old French#P]], but the only citations I could find weren't for this spelling. Or something like that. So the simple answer to your question is yes, but only if it meets [[WT:CFI#Attestation]]. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 22:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:59, 31 March 2013 [edit] Old French I think we're missing a section on this because the English's etymology section links to a nonexistent one. Should it be set up? Etym (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC) - It's listed on User:Mglovesfun/to do/Old French#P, but the only citations I could find weren't for this spelling. Or something like that. So the simple answer to your question is yes, but only if it meets WT:CFI#Attestation. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
| |