| | ::I have tentatively devised [[[[Template:etyl:qfa-jee]]]] for Macro-Jê. (Liliana may correct it to sai-jee or something else...) [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 00:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC) | | ::I have tentatively devised [[[[Template:etyl:qfa-jee]]]] for Macro-Jê. (Liliana may correct it to sai-jee or something else...) [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 00:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
| | :::Ah, CodeCat's fixed it to sai-mje. Thanks, CodeCat. I'll expand [[WT:Families]] to note that we don't use qfa when there's nai or sai available, or is that only partially true? [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 00:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC) | | :::Ah, CodeCat's fixed it to sai-mje. Thanks, CodeCat. I'll expand [[WT:Families]] to note that we don't use qfa when there's nai or sai available, or is that only partially true? [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 00:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | :::: Honestly I think for the sake of consistency we shouldn't use the 'non-family' codes ({{temp|etyl:nai}}, {{temp|etyl:sai}}, {{temp|etyl:aus}}, {{temp|etyl:pap}} and maybe others) at all. Right now we don't use them directly as families but we do use them as prefixes to create new codes. I would like that practice to be abandoned and all of them changed to use the qfa- prefix. {{User:CodeCat/signature}} 00:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
