← Older revision | Revision as of 00:41, 30 April 2012 |
Line 1,557: | Line 1,557: |
| Mg and I discussed this on [[WT:ID]], and he pointed out that this isn't a formal category (there's not formally any such thing as a 'proper adjective'). [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 22:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC) | | Mg and I discussed this on [[WT:ID]], and he pointed out that this isn't a formal category (there's not formally any such thing as a 'proper adjective'). [[User:-sche|- -sche]] [[User talk:-sche|(discuss)]] 22:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC) |
| : I'm not even sure what it's supposed to mean. Is it an adjective that expresses a relationship to a single defined entity? Like [[English]] does to [[England]]? I think delete... {{User:CodeCat/signature}} 22:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC) | | : I'm not even sure what it's supposed to mean. Is it an adjective that expresses a relationship to a single defined entity? Like [[English]] does to [[England]]? I think delete... {{User:CodeCat/signature}} 22:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC) |
| + | :: Yes, but then we lose functionality. How else could we sort together entries like [[Hitlerian]] and [[Napoleonic]]? --[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup> 00:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
| | | |
| == [[:File:2009-08 enwikt traffic stats per num headers.png]] == | | == [[:File:2009-08 enwikt traffic stats per num headers.png]] == |