Monday, August 1, 2011

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]: User talk:SemperBlotto

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]
Track the most recent changes to the wiki in this feed.
User talk:SemperBlotto
Aug 2nd 2011, 02:13

Special:Contributions/68.57.64.98:

← Older revision Revision as of 02:13, 2 August 2011
Line 850: Line 850:
Might I ask you to unblock this IP [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3A68.57.64.98]? In the page he created he has chosen the wrong language (English) and put the meaning in curly rather than in square brackets but this may reveal just his inexperience. One reason which deters me from assuming his malevolent/disruptive intention is that the translation of the Georgian verb provided by him, albeit in the wrong brackets, appears to be (I would refrain from asserting that, but it is listed at [[beget#translations]], therefore the [[Template:attention]]) valid. In my opinion the page is admissible in its current, already well-formatted shape. [[Special:Contributions/Bogorm|The uſer]] [[User:Bogorm|hight Bogorm]] [[User talk:Bogorm|converſation]] 16:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Might I ask you to unblock this IP [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3A68.57.64.98]? In the page he created he has chosen the wrong language (English) and put the meaning in curly rather than in square brackets but this may reveal just his inexperience. One reason which deters me from assuming his malevolent/disruptive intention is that the translation of the Georgian verb provided by him, albeit in the wrong brackets, appears to be (I would refrain from asserting that, but it is listed at [[beget#translations]], therefore the [[Template:attention]]) valid. In my opinion the page is admissible in its current, already well-formatted shape. [[Special:Contributions/Bogorm|The uſer]] [[User:Bogorm|hight Bogorm]] [[User talk:Bogorm|converſation]] 16:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
*He was blocked for 1 day for "disruptive edits". Are you saying that his edit did not disrupt me? or that "disruptive edits" should not be a reason for short blocks? [[User:SemperBlotto|SemperBlotto]] 19:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC) p.s. The entry still doesn't make much sense.
*He was blocked for 1 day for "disruptive edits". Are you saying that his edit did not disrupt me? or that "disruptive edits" should not be a reason for short blocks? [[User:SemperBlotto|SemperBlotto]] 19:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC) p.s. The entry still doesn't make much sense.
  +
  +
==Timtinnic==
  +
  +
Hello. Why was the word deleted? It is a real word used rarely.
  +
  +
[[User:Minneford|Minneford]] 02:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions