| | :::: So, to recap, we agree. And removing ''unknown'' was apparently appropriate after all. Thank goodness this was brought to the tearoom. [[User:Torvalu4|Torvalu4]] ([[User talk:Torvalu4|talk]]) 02:16, 28 September 2012 (UTC) | | :::: So, to recap, we agree. And removing ''unknown'' was apparently appropriate after all. Thank goodness this was brought to the tearoom. [[User:Torvalu4|Torvalu4]] ([[User talk:Torvalu4|talk]]) 02:16, 28 September 2012 (UTC) |
| | ::::: No it wasn't. If you had replaced Unknown with Uncertain it would have been appropriate. But that's not what you did. — ''[[User:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|Ungoliant]] <sup>([[User Talk:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|Falai]])</sup>'' 02:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC) | | ::::: No it wasn't. If you had replaced Unknown with Uncertain it would have been appropriate. But that's not what you did. — ''[[User:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|Ungoliant]] <sup>([[User Talk:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|Falai]])</sup>'' 02:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC) |
| | + | ::::::Not only ''[[bruja]]'' lost its uncertainty. So did ''[[terco]]'' and ''[[vega]]'' (no longer akin to Basque, but derived from Old Basque). As said before, I'm not contesting the information added. However, removing ambiguity is peculiar. --[[User:Robbie SWE|Robbie SWE]] ([[User talk:Robbie SWE|talk]]) 10:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC) |
