| | :: And this presumably goes without saying, but replacing "he" with "she" and/or "male" with "female" does not display the above pattern. "Female prostitute" is vanishingly rare; in fact, "he was|became a female prostitute" each get as many distinct, relevant hits as their counterparts with "she": zero and one, respectively. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 12:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC) | | :: And this presumably goes without saying, but replacing "he" with "she" and/or "male" with "female" does not display the above pattern. "Female prostitute" is vanishingly rare; in fact, "he was|became a female prostitute" each get as many distinct, relevant hits as their counterparts with "she": zero and one, respectively. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 12:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC) |
| | Are they not the same? They point to the same Wikipedia article, but I'm not sure (movies aren't quite my field of expertise) -- [[User:Liliana-60|Liliana]] [[User talk:Liliana-60|•]] 21:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC) | | Are they not the same? They point to the same Wikipedia article, but I'm not sure (movies aren't quite my field of expertise) -- [[User:Liliana-60|Liliana]] [[User talk:Liliana-60|•]] 21:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC) |
| | + | : From the edit history, it looks like the "audio dialogue replacement" sense got changed to "automated dialogue replacement" during the find-the-appropriate-Wikipedia-link process, and the editor didn't notice the resulting redundancy. (Recalcitrant as I am in my own poor proofreading, I can't criticize him.) I've merged and fixed the senses. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 02:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC) |
