| ::WT:FICTION is vague enough that anyone can simply dispute that a term has passed RFV under those criteria. I'm tempted to say that WT:FICTION actually has no meaning for our purposes. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 17:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC) | | ::WT:FICTION is vague enough that anyone can simply dispute that a term has passed RFV under those criteria. I'm tempted to say that WT:FICTION actually has no meaning for our purposes. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 17:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC) |
| :::Also both word and idiom are mentioned in [[WT:CFI]]. Look 'em up. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 17:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC) | | :::Also both word and idiom are mentioned in [[WT:CFI]]. Look 'em up. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 17:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC) |
| + | :::: Do you propose that "New York" should be deleted, as not being a word or an idiom? In this discussion, is it correct that you refuse to apply [[Wiktionary:CFI#Fictional_universes]] to "Tiny Tim"? --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] 17:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC) |