| | :: By that token, each entry that misses at least one class of information would be put an attention tag on it. These classes of information include pronunciation, etymology, synonyms, antonyms, related terms, translations, anagrams, etc. As a result, we could tag almost all Wiktionary entries. So again, I think it a poor idea. However, I admit that the category description is misleading; it can be found at [[Template:attentioncat]]. Going by category descriptions can be tricky; it is better to think about the meaningfulness of what one is doing. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] 07:46, 2 November 2011 (UTC) | | :: By that token, each entry that misses at least one class of information would be put an attention tag on it. These classes of information include pronunciation, etymology, synonyms, antonyms, related terms, translations, anagrams, etc. As a result, we could tag almost all Wiktionary entries. So again, I think it a poor idea. However, I admit that the category description is misleading; it can be found at [[Template:attentioncat]]. Going by category descriptions can be tricky; it is better to think about the meaningfulness of what one is doing. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] 07:46, 2 November 2011 (UTC) |
| | ::: Have I done something wrong? [[User:Maro|Maro]] 17:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC) | | ::: Have I done something wrong? [[User:Maro|Maro]] 17:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC) |
