Sunday, December 2, 2012

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]: Wiktionary:Requests for verification

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]
Track the most recent changes to the wiki in this feed.
Wiktionary:Requests for verification
Dec 2nd 2012, 23:11

kılgan:

← Older revision Revision as of 23:11, 2 December 2012
Line 2,264: Line 2,264:
 
Edit pattern? Wiktionary has many users that use the same patterns, so do you think that all of them is the same person? The forum "türkçesivarken" has many users that use this kind of words. See the "Ortak Türkçe Çalışmaları" section. When you search İngilizce -Türkçe sözlük [[http://www.google.com.tr/#hl=tr&safe=off&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=ingilizce+-t%C3%BCrk%C3%A7e+s%C3%B6zl%C3%BCk&oq=ingilizce+-t%C3%BCrk%C3%A7e+s%C3%B6zl%C3%BCk&gs_l=hp.3...527308.534461.8.534725.34.26.4.3.3.1.269.3489.3j21j2.26.0...0.0...1c.1.zq3bCCerie4&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=f345f8536c4f998f&bpcl=39314241&biw=1280&bih=896]] on Google, ingilizce.g3n.in is on the top of Google, so anyone may find it and see these words and then use them. They are purist or not. Is this a criterion for publishing words on the dictionaries? Can you say "we can not put the word '...' on the dictionary, because it is used by communists"? (I am not so good at speaking English, i tried to tell my thoughts as i could.) --[[Special:Contributions/85.102.181.45|85.102.181.45]] 06:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 
Edit pattern? Wiktionary has many users that use the same patterns, so do you think that all of them is the same person? The forum "türkçesivarken" has many users that use this kind of words. See the "Ortak Türkçe Çalışmaları" section. When you search İngilizce -Türkçe sözlük [[http://www.google.com.tr/#hl=tr&safe=off&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=ingilizce+-t%C3%BCrk%C3%A7e+s%C3%B6zl%C3%BCk&oq=ingilizce+-t%C3%BCrk%C3%A7e+s%C3%B6zl%C3%BCk&gs_l=hp.3...527308.534461.8.534725.34.26.4.3.3.1.269.3489.3j21j2.26.0...0.0...1c.1.zq3bCCerie4&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=f345f8536c4f998f&bpcl=39314241&biw=1280&bih=896]] on Google, ingilizce.g3n.in is on the top of Google, so anyone may find it and see these words and then use them. They are purist or not. Is this a criterion for publishing words on the dictionaries? Can you say "we can not put the word '...' on the dictionary, because it is used by communists"? (I am not so good at speaking English, i tried to tell my thoughts as i could.) --[[Special:Contributions/85.102.181.45|85.102.181.45]] 06:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:It doesn't matter. We need evidence of use in printed material, on Google Books, or on Usenet. Specifically, three quotes which use the word are required. —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 20:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:It doesn't matter. We need evidence of use in printed material, on Google Books, or on Usenet. Specifically, three quotes which use the word are required. —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 20:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
  +
Why the word [http://tr.wiktionary.org/wiki/püskevit püskevit] was not removed then? There may be a double standard? --[[Special:Contributions/88.238.156.112|88.238.156.112]] 23:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
   
 
== [[cobble]] ==
 
== [[cobble]] ==

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions