| | ::::::::::::* Such web-sites are not durably archived, so do not count for attestation purposes. Please see [[Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion#Attestation]]. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 15:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | | ::::::::::::* Such web-sites are not durably archived, so do not count for attestation purposes. Please see [[Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion#Attestation]]. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 15:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC) |
| | ::::::: If you can delete almost every pinyin entry that gets created, that would be great and maybe User:123abc would finally get the idea. You would be justified seeing as you are getting rid of a mass amount of material that is completely unattestable. If you have time, ideally, the pinyin entries should be searched for on Google Books to see if they can possibly be attested. But in my experience, most can't; even simple words like [[nǐhǎo]] are hard to attest in running Mandarin text. [[User:Tooironic|---> Tooironic]] 13:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | | ::::::: If you can delete almost every pinyin entry that gets created, that would be great and maybe User:123abc would finally get the idea. You would be justified seeing as you are getting rid of a mass amount of material that is completely unattestable. If you have time, ideally, the pinyin entries should be searched for on Google Books to see if they can possibly be attested. But in my experience, most can't; even simple words like [[nǐhǎo]] are hard to attest in running Mandarin text. [[User:Tooironic|---> Tooironic]] 13:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC) |
