Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]: Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup

Wiktionary - Recent changes [en]
Track the most recent changes to the wiki in this feed.
Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup
Nov 10th 2011, 01:49

virtue: archive

← Older revision Revision as of 01:49, 10 November 2011
Line 1,634: Line 1,634:
:::@msh210: Having thought about this further, I don't think I agree with your rationale in arguing against "alternative spelling of ____". In general, I doubt that most people ever think of any spelling that they use as an "alternative spelling" of some other spelling for the same word. If we took the view that a spelling is only an "alternative spelling" if its users see it as such, then we could probably just dispense with {{temp|alternative spelling of}} altogether. It would get so little use. I suppose you're distinguishing between users of {{term||'til|lang=en}}, who see it as a shortening of {{term||until|lang=en}}, and users of {{term||till|lang=en}}, who see it as a word in its own right; but this is a rather tenuous distinction. I'd bet that most users of {{term||till|lang=en}} do see it as an informal variant of {{term||until|lang=en}}, but spell it {{term||till|lang=en}} for the same reason that most people spell {{term|perk||perquisite|lang=en}} and {{term|tummy||stomach|lang=en}} and {{term|Nick||Nicholas|lang=en}} and {{term|Mike||Michael|lang=en}} and {{term|Shelly||Michelle|lang=en}} in ways that don't match their associated more-formal variants. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 21:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
:::@msh210: Having thought about this further, I don't think I agree with your rationale in arguing against "alternative spelling of ____". In general, I doubt that most people ever think of any spelling that they use as an "alternative spelling" of some other spelling for the same word. If we took the view that a spelling is only an "alternative spelling" if its users see it as such, then we could probably just dispense with {{temp|alternative spelling of}} altogether. It would get so little use. I suppose you're distinguishing between users of {{term||'til|lang=en}}, who see it as a shortening of {{term||until|lang=en}}, and users of {{term||till|lang=en}}, who see it as a word in its own right; but this is a rather tenuous distinction. I'd bet that most users of {{term||till|lang=en}} do see it as an informal variant of {{term||until|lang=en}}, but spell it {{term||till|lang=en}} for the same reason that most people spell {{term|perk||perquisite|lang=en}} and {{term|tummy||stomach|lang=en}} and {{term|Nick||Nicholas|lang=en}} and {{term|Mike||Michael|lang=en}} and {{term|Shelly||Michelle|lang=en}} in ways that don't match their associated more-formal variants. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]]<sub ><small ><i >[[User talk: Ruakh |TALK]]</i ></small ></sub > 21:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 
==<s> [[:virtue]]</s> ==
 
 
A total mess. The definitions are a catastrophe. -- [[User:Prince Kassad|Prince Kassad]] 19:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 
:I agree. --[[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 20:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 
::Even Webster 1913 definitions would have been better as a starting point. [[User: DCDuring |DCDuring]] <small >[[User talk: DCDuring|TALK]]</small > 22:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 
*I just rewrote it all from scratch. <{{#switch:|term|ital=i|head|bold=b|span}} class="latinx" {{#if:|lang="{{{lang}}}"}}>[[User:Widsith|Ƿidsiþ]]</{{#switch:|term|ital=i|head|bold=b|span}}> 10:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 
== [[sex life]] ==
== [[sex life]] ==

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions